| Research quality | Relevance for society | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | Products for peers | Products for society |
| Use | Use by peers | Use by society |
| Recognition | Recognition by peers | Recognition from society |
Research evaluations following the Strategy Evaluation Protocol
2 May 2024
What does Team RI do?
We demonstrate research impact by …
- Collecting data on research
- for group, department, faculty
- linking those data to indicators
- citations, media attention, impact on policy, SDGs
- giving insight into impact to improve decision making.
- visualisations, interactive dashboards
How is this used?
- Support for self-evaluation
- Support for SEP
- Possibilities for cooperation
- Explore possibilities for appointments
- …
Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-’27
…evaluate a research unit in light of its own aims and strategy…
…coherent narrative argument supported by factual evidence…
…leaves room for plurality with respect to the application and interpretation…
Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-’27
Main assessment criteria
- Research Quality
- Societal relevance
- Viability
The unit addresses at least…
- Open Science
- PhD policy and training
- Academic culture
- Human resources policy
…integral aspects of each of the main assessment criteria…
Dora and Barcelona
DORA-compliant
- No journal-based measures
- Consider all research outputs
- Be open and transparent
- Open research information becomes the norm
- Collaborate on the transition from closed to open research information
Indicators
| Research quality | Relevance for society | |
|---|---|---|
| Products | Publications | Relevance for theme (e.g. SDGs) |
| Use | Citations | Mentions in media, policy, clinical guidelines |
| Recognition | Top p% cited | - |
Enrichment
- Research profile
- Collaborations
- Benchmark
- % open access
Difficult
- Software, data, preprint
- Patents, startups
- Media appearance
- Authorship of policy
Data sources
- Pure
- Openalex (open source)
- Altmetric
- …