| Research quality | Relevance for society | |
| Products | Products for peers | Products for society |
| Use | Use by peers | Use by society |
| Recognition | Recognition by peers | Recognition from society |
Research evaluations following the Strategy Evaluation Protocol
2 May 2024
What does Team RI do?
We demonstrate research impact by …
- Collecting data on research
for group, department, faculty - linking those data to indicators
citations, media attention, impact on policy, SDGs - giving insight into impact to improve decision making.
visualisations, interactive dashboards
How is this used?
- Support for self-evaluation
- Support for SEP
- Possibilities for cooperation
- Explore possibilities for appointments
- …
Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-’27
…evaluate a research unit in light of its own aims and strategy…
…coherent narrative argument supported by factual evidence…
…leaves room for plurality with respect to the application and interpretation…
Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-’27
Main assessment criteria
Research Quality
Societal relevance
Viability
The unit addresses at least…
Open Science
PhD policy and training
Academic culture
Human resources policy
…integral aspects of each of the main assessment criteria…
Dora and Barcelona
DORA-compliant
No journal-based measures
Consider all research outputs
Be open and transparent
Open research information becomes the norm
Collaborate on the transition from closed to open research information
Indicators
| Research quality | Relevance for society | |
| Products | Publications | Relevance for theme (e.g. SDGs) |
| Use | Citations | Mentions in media, policy, guidelines |
| Recognition | Top p% cited | - |
Enrichment
Research profile
Collaborations
Benchmark
% open access
Difficult
Software, data, preprint
Patents, startups
Media appearance
Authorship of policy
Data sources
Pure
Openalex (open source)
Altmetric
…